If Irvin thinks he was robbed then he is dellusional. It was clearly an Illegal knee he threw. Shamrock was correct to stop the fight. Irvin should have lost this fight via disqualification. The fact it was returned as a no-contest spared Irvin from having another loss on his record. Mike was doing so well against him and I believe Irvin thought he would finish him early against the cage but he couldn't pound him out. Mike seemed to be doing a great job of standing up and was almost ready to better his position before the illegal knee. I thought Irvin would have had more class.

It was mostly referring to the statement he made after

Speaking of fights, your last one ended after an inadvertent illegal knee to the head of your opponent. As a result, Ken Shamrock ruled the fight a No Contest. What really went down in the cage?

Honestly, three weeks ago Ken turned down a fight with me, so as soon as I saw that he was going to be the ref I had a bad feeling. He kept coming back to the locker room to give us his version of the rules like this was my first rodeo. As for Crisman, I beat the brakes off this fool. I KO'd the guy and walked away before Shamrock even got there, and two minutes later, he says I illegally kneed him and it's a no contest. It's cool. I don't have a scratch on me, and [Gladiator Challenge promoter] Tedd Williams says I can rematch Crisman in May.

It wouldn't have been so bad if he hadn't so blatantly used an illegal technique.